# Redundant declarations in interface PConstants

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/redundant-declarations-in-interface-pconstants/8602>\
**Category:** Processing\
**Created:** [February 21, 2019, 5:38pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/redundant-declarations-in-interface-pconstants/8602 "2019-02-21T17:38:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GoToLoop](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/gotoloop/32/86_2.png) [@GoToLoop](https://discourse.processing.org/u/GoToLoop)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2019, 7:07pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/redundant-declarations-in-interface-pconstants/8602/8 "2019-02-21T19:07:21Z")

</div>

> [@quark](#):
>
> … has _ **nothing** _ to do with the topic under discussion.

But it has EVERYTHING to do as a sideline followup of my previous warning:

> [@Multiple classes in an (undefined) ArrayList?](https://discourse.processing.org/t/multiple-classes-in-an-undefined-arraylist/8291/11):
>
> Not the fields. Actually, any fields declared in an interface are implicitly public, static & final! no_mouth

IMO, a mere sideline comment isn’t enough to make a discussion to become hijacked as you had stated.

This split action was completely over-the-top. But whatever… 🤷‍♂️

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/redundant-declarations-in-interface-pconstants/8602)._