# Processing + Python community visibility

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-python-community-visibility/38981>\
**Category:** Processing.py\
**Created:** [September 26, 2022, 4:43pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-python-community-visibility/38981 "2022-09-26T16:43:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![josephh](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/josephh/32/210_2.png) [@josephh](https://discourse.processing.org/u/josephh)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2022, 7:44am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-python-community-visibility/38981/2 "2022-09-27T07:44:40Z")

</div>

Is Processing.py fully part of the Processing foundation? It’s not part of the GitHub organization: [Processing Foundation · GitHub](https://github.com/processing/)

Also linking to this previous thread because it contains useful thoughts on the future of Processing.py:

> [@What is the future of Processing Python Mode?](https://discourse.processing.org/t/what-is-the-future-of-processing-python-mode/35009):
>
> What are the current plans for the future of Processing Python Mode or, alternatively, for a Python package based on the core ideas of Processing, such as p5py, but that is as easy to install as Python Mode? See: As we know, Python Mode is now available for Processing 4. However, it is still based on [Jython](https://www.jython.org/), which is Python 2. The book [Learn Python Visually (2021)](https://nostarch.com/Learn-Python-Visually) offers many fine examples of sketches designed for Processing Python Mode. At the same time, it is compatible with Python 3. The …

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-python-community-visibility/38981)._