# Processing library same function as numpy

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-library-same-function-as-numpy/41747>\
**Category:** Libraries\
**Created:** [April 18, 2023, 1:40am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-library-same-function-as-numpy/41747 "2023-04-18T01:40:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solub](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/solub/32/333_2.png) [@solub](https://discourse.processing.org/u/solub)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2023, 10:16am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-library-same-function-as-numpy/41747/3 "2023-04-18T10:16:34Z")

</div>

> [@Libraries not listed on Libraries page?](https://discourse.processing.org/t/libraries-not-listed-on-libraries-page/11806/7):
>
> Just to clarify, JAMA is linear algebra library for Java (not primarily designed for Procesing) that can be used within P5. I’ve read that [EJML](https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/ejml) (also P5 compatible like any other Java library I guess) is faster, the absolute winner being [ojAlgo](https://github.com/optimatika/ojAlgo/wiki/Getting-Started) according to [this](https://github.com/optimatika/ojAlgo/wiki/Java-Matrix-Benchmark) benchmark. (curious to know how these compare to [ND4J](https://deeplearning4j.org/docs/latest/nd4j-overview)) Incidentally, it would be interesting to have a place (somewhere on this forum or on a specific website / github page) dedicated to the most popular/convenient non-Process…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-library-same-function-as-numpy/41747)._