# PraxisLIVE v5 beta-1, libp5x and LWJGL renderer

**URL:** https://discourse.processing.org/t/praxislive-v5-beta-1-libp5x-and-lwjgl-renderer/22932
**Category:** Processing
**Created:** [July 30, 2020, 4:33pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/praxislive-v5-beta-1-libp5x-and-lwjgl-renderer/22932 "2020-07-30T16:33:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![neilcsmith](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/neilcsmith/32/144_2.png) [@neilcsmith](https://discourse.processing.org/u/neilcsmith)
#### Post date: [July 31, 2020, 10:10am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/praxislive-v5-beta-1-libp5x-and-lwjgl-renderer/22932/4 "2020-07-31T10:10:28Z")

</div>

> [@micycle](#):
>
> Was this with Processing 3? What about Processing 4?

An issue was opened (and closed) against Processing 4 about this - see also this thread - [Main thread task context API (LWJGL)](https://discourse.processing.org/t/main-thread-task-context-api-lwjgl/17226)

The current libp5x fork is based on 3.5.3. Processing 4 is a bit of a moving target at the moment. I’ll likely maintain a Java 11 / Processing 3 compatible version for a while, possibly with a JOGL renderer as an alternative option. Unfortunately can’t make this 100% compatible, as the JOGL code will need moving to another package because of Java module rules.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/praxislive-v5-beta-1-libp5x-and-lwjgl-renderer/22932)._