# Libraries not listed on Libraries page?

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/libraries-not-listed-on-libraries-page/11806>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [June 3, 2019, 5:45pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/libraries-not-listed-on-libraries-page/11806 "2019-06-03T17:45:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solub](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/solub/32/333_2.png) [@solub](https://discourse.processing.org/u/solub)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2019, 9:08pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/libraries-not-listed-on-libraries-page/11806/7 "2019-06-18T21:08:05Z")

</div>

Just to clarify, JAMA is linear algebra library for Java (not primarily designed _for_ Procesing) that can be used within P5. I’ve read that [EJML](https://github.com/lessthanoptimal/ejml) (also P5 compatible like any other Java library I guess) is faster, the absolute winner being [ojAlgo](https://github.com/optimatika/ojAlgo/wiki/Getting-Started) according to [this](https://github.com/optimatika/ojAlgo/wiki/Java-Matrix-Benchmark) benchmark. (curious to know how these compare to [ND4J](https://deeplearning4j.org/docs/latest/nd4j-overview))

 ![bench](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/uploads/processingfoundation1/original/2X/0/0a6ff1078649d509cece487c938c6ce09554dcc9.png)

Incidentally, it would be interesting to have a _place_ (somewhere on this forum or on a specific website / github page) dedicated to the most popular/convenient non-Processing libraries that are compatible with Processing Java **and** Python.  
For example, in Python mode I like to use [Bridson](https://pypi.org/project/bridson/) for Poisson Disk Sampling or [OpenSimplex](https://pypi.org/project/opensimplex/) for simplex noise. These libraries are fairly simple but extremely useful in a lot of cases.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/libraries-not-listed-on-libraries-page/11806)._