# JOGL-2.4 and JDK11 sketches

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/jogl-2-4-and-jdk11-sketches/18643>\
**Category:** Processing for Pi\
**Created:** [March 13, 2020, 4:15pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/jogl-2-4-and-jdk11-sketches/18643 "2020-03-13T16:15:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monkstone](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/monkstone/32/64_2.png) [@monkstone](https://discourse.processing.org/u/monkstone)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2020, 4:15pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/jogl-2-4-and-jdk11-sketches/18643/1 "2020-03-13T16:15:25Z")

</div>

I recently announced a pre-release of [PiCrate-2.0 for the RaspberryPI](https://discourse.processing.org/t/droste-video-capture-sketch-on-raspberrypi4/18566), where I was using `--add-opens` to suppress reflective access warnings, with P2D and P3D with the [processing.org](http://processing.org) modified `jogl.jars` version 2.3.2. However I have found that this is not necessary with current JOGL 2.4.0 rc release. See Screenshot of Hype Sketch:-

 ![grid_layout](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/uploads/processingfoundation1/original/2X/3/350dfc94c748ac57ddeb9f2be1e6879381d97d1b.png)  
I’m tempted to include JOGL-2.4.0-rc in my next PiCrate release.