# Choice of OpenJDK is Critical

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/choice-of-openjdk-is-critical/16141>\
**Category:** Processing\
**Created:** [December 5, 2019, 7:22am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/choice-of-openjdk-is-critical/16141 "2019-12-05T07:22:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monkstone](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/monkstone/32/64_2.png) [@monkstone](https://discourse.processing.org/u/monkstone)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2019, 7:57pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/choice-of-openjdk-is-critical/16141/4 "2019-12-05T19:57:30Z")

</div>

Of course these comments apply to the way things stand at present (including Sam Pottingers work), but things seem to be afoot with [jogl development](https://github.com/sgothel/jogl) that could change all that.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.processing.org/t/choice-of-openjdk-is-critical/16141)._