# Acerca de la licencia comercial de processing java

**URL:** <https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711>\
**Category:** Processing\
**Created:** [November 25, 2020, 8:11pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711 "2020-11-25T20:11:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![datacolor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f6c823/32.png) [@datacolor](https://discourse.processing.org/u/datacolor)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 8:11pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711/1 "2020-11-25T20:11:20Z")

</div>

Hola alguien puede explicarme lo siguiente,si yo hago un sketch que no usa ninguna libreria (excepto las del core de processing unicamente!),y hago una aplicacion exportando el sketch a aplicacion.exe…es posible comercializar un sistema o dispositivo que hace uso de dicha aplicacion derivada del sketch de processing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![josephh](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/josephh/32/210_2.png) [@josephh](https://discourse.processing.org/u/josephh)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 9:11pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711/2 "2020-11-25T21:11:06Z")

</div>

Hola,

Para la licencia que Processing usos, puedes comprobar aquellos enlaces :

Para **el editor y documentación** :

> The Reference for the Language and Environment are under a Creative Commons license which makes it possible to re-use this content for non-commercial purposes if it is credited.

[https://processing.org/copyright.html](https://processing.org/copyright.html)

Para el **código fuente** , la licencia múltiple está utilizada incluyendo [GPL v2](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html#top), [LGPL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License) :

> <https://github.com/processing/processing/blob/master/license.txt>

_Nota : esto estuvo traducido de english porque puedo no correctamente escribir en español 🙂_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![datacolor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f6c823/32.png) [@datacolor](https://discourse.processing.org/u/datacolor)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 9:59pm UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711/3 "2020-11-25T21:59:02Z")

</div>

Thank you for answering this question, then I understand that if I include the source code in my commercial system, I would not have problems when marketing an electronic system that uses the executable derived from the processing sketch? Is this so or not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GoToLoop](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.processing.org/gotoloop/32/86_2.png) [@GoToLoop](https://discourse.processing.org/u/GoToLoop)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2020, 2:14am UTC](https://discourse.processing.org/t/acerca-de-la-licencia-comercial-de-processing-java/25711/4 "2020-11-26T02:14:21Z")

</div>

> [@datacolor](#):
>
> Is this so or not?

If you don’t make any modifications to a GPL library you just need to include the GPL license text and a link to the original source code.

Otherwise if you change the GPL source code you need to also include a link w/ the modified changes.

You can choose another license for your own sketch code though.  
It’s totally independent from the GPL Processing library.
